|
NAME of LEARNER |
NAME of ASSESSOR |
||||
|
VENUE |
DATE of REVIEW |
||||
|
UNIT STANDARD |
Install and commission a local area computer network |
||||
|
Review Dimension |
ASSESSOR |
LEARNER/ CANDIDATE |
ACTION |
||
|
The principles/criteria for good assessment were achieved. |
Agree Disagree |
Agree Disagree |
|||
|
The assessment related to the registered unit standard. |
Agree Disagree |
Agree Disagree |
|||
|
The assessment was practical. |
Agree Disagree |
Agree Disagree |
|||
|
It was time efficient and cost-effective and did not interfere with my normal responsibilities. |
Agree Disagree |
Agree Disagree |
|||
|
The assessment instruments were fair, clear and understandable. |
Agree Disagree |
Agree Disagree |
|||
|
The assessment judgment was made against set requirements. |
Agree Disagree |
Agree Disagree |
|||
|
The venue and equipment was functional. |
Agree Disagree |
Agree Disagree |
|||
|
Special needs were identified and the assessment plan was adjusted. |
Agree Disagree |
Agree Disagree |
||||||
|
Feedback was constructive against the evidence required. |
Agree Disagree |
Agree Disagree |
||||||
|
An opportunity to appeal was given. |
Agree Disagree |
Agree Disagree |
||||||
|
The evidence was recorded. |
Agree Disagree |
Agree Disagree |
||||||
|
LEARNER”S DECLARATION OF UNDERSTANDING |
||||||||
|
I am aware of the moderation process and understand that the moderator could declare the assessment decision invalid. |
||||||||
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
Learner |
Date |
Assessor |
Date |
Moderator |
Date |
|||