NAME of LEARNER | NAME of ASSESSOR | ||||
VENUE | DATE of REVIEW | ||||
UNIT STANDARD | Enhance, edit and organise electronic messages using a Graphical User Interface (GUI)-based messaging application | ||||
Review Dimension | ASSESSOR | LEARNER/
CANDIDATE |
ACTION | ||
The principles/criteria for good assessment were achieved. | Agree
Disagree |
Agree
Disagree |
|||
The assessment related to the registered unit standard. | Agree
Disagree |
Agree
Disagree |
|||
The assessment was practical. | Agree
Disagree |
Agree
Disagree |
|||
It was time efficient and cost-effective and did not interfere with my normal responsibilities. | Agree
Disagree |
Agree
Disagree |
|||
The assessment instruments were fair, clear and understandable. | Agree
Disagree |
Agree
Disagree |
|||
The assessment judgment was made against set requirements. | Agree
Disagree |
Agree
Disagree |
|||
The venue and equipment was functional. | Agree
Disagree |
Agree
Disagree |
|||
Special needs were identified and the assessment plan was adjusted. | Agree
Disagree |
Agree
Disagree |
||||||
Feedback was constructive against the evidence required. | Agree
Disagree |
Agree
Disagree |
||||||
An opportunity to appeal was given. | Agree
Disagree |
Agree
Disagree |
||||||
The evidence was recorded. | Agree
Disagree |
Agree
Disagree |
||||||
LEARNER”S DECLARATION OF UNDERSTANDING | ||||||||
I am aware of the moderation process and understand that the moderator could declare the assessment decision invalid. | ||||||||
|
||||||||
Learner | Date | Assessor | Date | Moderator | Date | |||
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.